From: Meryl Lanson [meryll@aksi.net]

Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 2:27 PM

To: Edith Osman

Subject: Subsequent Information to Material Provided to You

Dear Ms. Osman.

In addition to the numerous ethical violations committed by Messrs. Kopplow and Cooper, as outlined in my voluminous Binder complaint and subsequence correspondence, through my ongoing research I have uncovered another violation of The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar not previously submitted.

4-1.8 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions (g) Settlement of Claims for Multiple Clients. A lawyer who represents 2 or more clients shall not participate in making an aggregate settlement of the claims of or against the clients, or in a criminal case an aggregate agreement as to guilty or nolo contendre pleas, unless each client consents after consultation, including disclosure of the existence and nature of all the claims or pleas involved and of the participation of each person in the settlement.

Ms. Osman, Messrs. Kopplow and Cooper settled the underlying lawsuit without the consent of all "their clients". As a matter of FACT, Messrs. Kopplow and Cooper settled the underlying lawsuit over the WRITTEN OBJECTIONS OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS.

It has been one week today since you received my response to your request. I would like to know when I will be afforded an impartial and acceptable panel to grant me my due process rights in hearing the Grievance Complaint which I have provided to numerous members of The Florida Bar and Supreme Court of Florida.

Sincerely,

Meryl L. Lanson